U.S. SEC Backs Off Crypto Dealer Fight, Continues Resetting Industry Approach

Already losing its legal fight with the crypto industry over a rule that would have expanded the definition of regulated securities dealers to include a wide array of digital assets operations, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has given up its appeal.

The SEC has been in reset mode on its courtroom entanglements with crypto issues as the leadership elevated by President Donald Trump has been reversing years of the agency’s adversarial stance. The latest move was to formally drop the appeal in a case in which the Blockchain Association and Crypto Freedom Alliance of Texas sued the SEC and a Texas federal judge agreed that the regulator “exceeded its statutory authority.”

“With new leadership at the agency leading to today’s final dismissal, we’re looking forward to productive conversations between industry and the SEC moving forward – and a brighter future for digital assets in the United States,” said Blockchain Association CEO Kristin Smith, in a statement.

The rewritten dealer rule was one of the agency’s major efforts at crypto rulemaking under the tenure of former chairman Gary Gensler, and it was crafted with the agency’s longtime stance in mind that existing laws were sufficient to handle the oversight of the digital assets space. The industry’s position was that the rule made untenable demands on decentralized finance (DeFi) and also roped in crypto traders who didn’t offer dealer services.

The agency didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment on the legal withdrawal.

Since being installed as the SEC’s acting chairman, Mark Uyeda, has begun to aggressively overhaul the agency’s senior staff and its legal approach to the crypto sector. He’s set to be replaced whenever Trump’s permanent pick, Paul Atkins, can be confirmed by the U.S. Senate, though Atkins is expected to continue in the same path.

Earlier this month, the SEC also sought to pause its enforcement fight with Binance over the agency’s accusations of securities violations so the matter could be resolved in another way.