Palantir Launches AI Platform for Military Use, Raises Concerns Over Ethics

In the video, Palantir showcased how its software could be used by the military in modern warfare scenarios. An operator could use a ChatGPT-style chatbot to order drone reconnaissance, generate attack plans, and coordinate the jamming of enemy communications. The launch of AIP is sure to raise questions about the ethical implications of Palantir’s involvement in military operations.

To achieve ethical and legal use, the Palantir AIP was built on three “key pillars.” Firstly, AIP operates within a classified system, enabling it to analyze classified and non-classified data in real time while ensuring ethical and legal compliance. The second feature of the AIP enables users to govern the actions of each LLM and asset operating on the network.

AIP generates a secure digital record of the entire operation, which the video claims is crucial in mitigating significant legal, regulatory, and ethical risks in sensitive and classified settings. Finally, AIP has industry-leading guardrails in place to prevent unauthorized actions, thus ensuring the safe use of the system.

The military operator featured in the video demonstrates the practical application of Palantir’s scenario in responding to a potential threat in Eastern Europe. By using AIP, the operator could efficiently and effectively gather more information about the enemy’s military equipment. With the help of the AIP’s large language models, the operator was also able to quickly ask questions and obtain accurate answers. 

Although the AIP’s abilities were showcased effectively, Palantir recognizes the importance of governing the application of LLMs and algorithms in sensitive situations, particularly in military endeavors. There are also concerns about the reliability and effectiveness of the technology, particularly about preventing LLMs from generating false facts and details.

Palantir has gained notoriety for providing contentious data-analysis software to government organizations. The company has been criticized by privacy experts for surveillance and analysis of data that violates people’s privacy. The use of its technology by US immigration authorities to apprehend undocumented immigrants has sparked protests. In the UK, the health data handled by the firm has also raised alarms.

Read more: