According to the experts, if you can divide things down, you can actually create more of them!
Lord Keynes himself could never have imagined such wonders.
Then thereโs Paul Krugman. One of the greatest of the greats, faxed the world his opinion, after having been on the wrong side of history (again). I think this time heโs right. Bitcoin has failed.
Fiat geniuses and Nobel Prize winners such as Krugman are known for their incredible predictions, whether it comes to the impact of the internet , or more recently, Bitcoin.
Krugman has been warning us all for years now of the peril of being involved in Bitcoin. Have you been listening?
Young Liron Shapira below sure has been:
Oh, Shapira. How could we have not noticed that bitcoin fell 80% (again) and that despite the same thing having happened many times in the last decade , that this time will be different, in the face of orders of magnitude more hash rate , wallets , users and technical development ?
Jeez. Bitcoiners are such ignorant morons. They have no idea!
Itโs over for retail. There are no more people on the planet who need sound money and savings that wonโt melt like iceโฆ
Back to the U.S. dollar we go:
Oops โฆ thatโs the logarithmic chart. The real difference is better represented in absolute terms. This recent โbitcoin is deadโ phase can be seen in the bottom right hand corner, where the arrow is pointing. This proves the point unequivocally. Bitcoin is dead.
Look! The USD may be suffering a little bit, but at least with it we get cheap TVs !
Reader: please ignore the top half of the following chart. Things like food, healthcare and housing are not important. What matters is that we have a regulated medium of exchange issued by fossils over at the central bank. Only in this way can we have a clearly functional society where irrelevant conveniences like medical service go up in price while TVs go down!
The Facebook To Your Myspace! Bitcoin has failed to innovate. In 2022, weโve created faster, newer, more โdEcEnTrALiZeDโ blockchains, like Solana. Nevermind that Solana backwards is actually โAnal OS.โ Thatโs just a coincidence made up by that toxic nym Gigi .
Weโve moved on from old school technologies like proof of work. Weโre now using energy efficient consensus mechanisms like proof of stake :
Also โ just incase you havenโt noticed, the Federal Reserve isnโt printing any more money, so now venture capital firms have decided to take it upon themselves to print in its stead. The methodology is brilliant and quite simple:
Take a little bit of seed money, mix it with some technical buzzwords, wrap it in a very healthy dose of modern marketing with friends over at Facebook and Google, then have it served by everyoneโs favorite Instagram celebrity.
Itโs a beautiful thing.
Why would anyone need something so boring as sound money in a world where money doesnโt even need to grow on trees, but can be conjured up with a few lines of code?
Why would anyone need energy money, inconveniently rooted in the laws of thermodynamics which thus cannot be printed, changed or manipulated, when you can just get tatted-up hedge fund managers and washed up bears from investment banks to pump digital Ponzi schemes?
I mean, just look at the caliber of people backing โcrypto โ:
Seriously man.
You Bitcoiners have philosophers, engineers, writers, artists and memers. What are they good for?
We have โinfluencersโ and JPMorgan executives, because โcRyPtO is dA fEwTcHa.โ
Bitcoin Is For Losers It has clearly failed because, in 2022, you can be an artist and get paid directly. You can monetize your incredible, Fiverr-created or AI-generated JPEG on OpenSea and the lemmings โฆ I mean โfansโ โฆ will buy it because they love your art!
Didnโt you know this?
Why in the world would you still need Bitcoin when you can do this?
NFTs have and will continue to take the world by storm.
And once again, Bitcoiners have failed to evolve and change with the times. Just like they missed out on ICOs, theyโre missing out on NFTs. And theyโll miss out on more.
Why? Because there is much moreโฆ
Have you heard about the Metaverse, or the decentralized land on the blockchain ? Why would you own real land in the real world, or something as useless as a โsToRe oF vALuEโ when you can ackchyually own land on a $1.3 billion network like Decentraland ?
Metaverse projects are backed by the smartest people in the world, like Andreessen Horowitz , and itโs truly the future. Come join us and the other 38 people on the network.
Itโs a new world, and Bitcoiners are old news.
This is what happens when you donโt adapt and conform to the world around you. You miss out on everything. Even on free money.
Yield! You Bitcoiners are so stupid that you donโt even get any yield. You sit there with your silly store-of-value tokens, locked up in wallets doing absolutely nothing! Seriously?
Itโs 2022. Didnโt you know you have to make your money work for you? Thatโs what cryptocurrencies and DeFi are all about! Another reason why bitcoin is so dumb.
Using the power of root vegetables , weโve figured out how to conjure yield from digital money that in turn is conjured up from code, which in turn is conjured up from the imagination of the smartest 20 year olds in the world!
Itโs magic all the way down, and weโre making all sorts of money.
DeFi, CeFi, yield, yams. Weโve got it all.
What do you have? Store of value. Hah!
At least some of you are smart enough to wrap your BTC in ETH and stake it, or at the very least, put your bitcoin to work for 3%.
Sure there may be some risks, but you canโt make an omelet without breaking a few eggs. And thatโs what Bitcoiners donโt understand. To make progress, you have to move fast and break things.
Source: Google
Source: CoinDesk
The Facts Bitcoiners just donโt get it. Theyโre a brainwashed cult full of fascist conspiracy theorists and extremists who are too busy being toxic assholes instead of coming to terms with reality.
This is why theyโre all wrong. The rest of us, living in the real world, know the facts. And theyโre pretty simple:
Bitcoin is old technology. Itโs like the Myspace of cryptocurrency . Central banks are raising rates , which means theyโll never again print money. Jerome Powell is the new Paul Volcker and heโs going to set things straight, while Christine Lagarde, together with friends in the European Central Bank, are going to save Europe. The great leaders at the World Economic Forum have all our best interests at heart. They want to make the world green , and will help the central banks create a global central bank digital currency (CBDC) that is so much better than bitcoin. Unlike CBDCs which will be given to everyone, bitcoin is so unevenly distributed that 10 people own, like, all of it. They can change the rules if they really want to. Richard Heart said so , and heโs always right. Of course, then thereโs the risk of Satoshi Nakamoto moving his bitcoin. That will prove itโs not unchangeable. People are starting to realize this. Bitcoin doesnโt have a security budget, or a development budget. When the block reward runs out, all the miners will go broke because, 120 years from now, the price of bitcoin will be $1,000 so thereโs not enough to be made from fees! And without a development budget, who is going to upgrade Bitcoin to proof of stake? Did you ever think about that? I bet you didnโt! And look. Most importantly of all, bitcoin is not even real. I mean โ have you even touched one? Didnโt think so. How can something like that be worth anything? There is no intrinsic value.
At the very least, these are all reasons why you should have a diverse portfolio, because you never know what will be the next bitcoin.
Itโs been around for 13 years and itโs about time for it to stop going up. And with all thatโs happening around the world, I think itโs pretty obvious at this point. If you canโt see it, even with all of the evidence from the experts, I donโt know what else to tell you.
Except of course:
Have fun staying poor!
This is a guest post by Aleks Svetski , author of โ The UnCommunist Manifesto ,โ, founder of The Bitcoin Times and Host of The Wake Up Podcast . Opinions expressed are entirely their own and do not necessarily reflect those of BTC Inc or Bitcoin Magazine.